Get Paid to Test Websites (2026): 10 UX Testing Platforms That Pay $10–$60 Per Test

Website testing pays better than surveys. Substantially better. A single 15–20 minute test pays $5–$15 on most platforms, with live moderated sessions running $30–$60 for 30–60 minutes of your time. Compare that to $0.50–$3.00 for a 15-minute survey, and the math is clear.

The catch: getting tests is harder than getting surveys. You need to speak clearly while recording your screen, navigate websites while verbalising your thought process, and pass a qualification test before most platforms accept you. The test volume is lower — you might receive 2–5 test invitations per week rather than the dozens of survey opportunities available daily.

But the per-hour rate makes website testing one of the highest-paying microtask opportunities available online. If surveys pay $3–$5/hour, website testing pays $15–$30/hour for the same fundamental concept: sharing your opinions about products.

I’ve spent over 15 years evaluating income methods. Website testing occupies an interesting niche — it pays meaningfully better than surveys, requires only basic tech literacy (not professional UX expertise), but produces less total monthly income than delivery gigs or freelancing because test availability is limited.

First — This Is Important…

Hey, my name is Mark.

Website testing is one of the better-paying microtask options — $10–$60 per test instead of $0.50–$3 per survey. But test availability limits monthly income to roughly $100–$500 for most testers. That’s real money, but it’s still supplemental.

The model I rely on generates $500–$1,200/month per digital asset, recurring, without test availability limits and without trading time for individual task payments.

Go here to see the exact system I use to do this

Here’s how website testing works and which platforms pay the best.

How Website Testing Works

Website testing (also called user testing or UX testing) is a method companies use to evaluate how real people interact with their websites, apps, and digital products. Instead of relying on internal feedback from employees who know the product intimately, companies pay outsiders to navigate their interfaces and share honest reactions.

The typical unmoderated test (most common):

1. You receive an invitation for a test matching your demographic profile
2. You install a screen recorder (most platforms have their own recorder or browser extension)
3. You receive a set of tasks: “Find the pricing page,” “Add a product to your cart,” “Complete the checkout process”
4. While completing tasks, you speak your thoughts aloud: “I’m looking for pricing… I expected it to be in the main navigation but I don’t see it… Oh wait, it’s hidden in the footer… that’s confusing”
5. Your screen recording and audio are captured and submitted
6. A reviewer checks that your recording meets quality standards (clear audio, completed tasks, genuine feedback)
7. You get paid — typically $5–$15 per test, arriving within 7–14 days via PayPal

The moderated test (higher paying, less frequent):

1. You schedule a live video call with a researcher at a specific time
2. The researcher guides you through the product, asking questions and observing your behaviour in real-time
3. Sessions typically last 30–60 minutes
4. Pay ranges from $30–$120 depending on session length and complexity
5. These are less frequent but significantly more lucrative per session

What companies learn from your tests: Where users get confused, which features go unnoticed, whether the checkout flow is intuitive, how users search for information, and whether the overall experience meets expectations. Your fumbling around trying to find a “Contact Us” page is genuinely valuable data that helps companies improve their products.

What You Need to Get Started

Equipment requirements are minimal:

• Computer or smartphone (most tests work on either, but computer tests are more common and pay more)
• Stable internet connection (video streaming quality — buffering or disconnections during recording will cause your test to be rejected)
• Working microphone (built-in laptop/phone microphone is fine for most platforms — external microphones improve quality but aren’t required)
• Webcam (some tests require face recording alongside screen recording — your laptop webcam works)
• A quiet environment (background noise, TV, or other people talking will cause test rejection)

Skills required:

• Ability to speak clearly while navigating a website (this is the actual skill — articulating your thoughts in real-time while performing tasks)
• Basic computer literacy (you don’t need technical expertise, but you need to be comfortable navigating websites and apps)
• Honest, detailed feedback (vague responses like “it’s fine” or “I don’t know” produce low ratings and fewer future invitations)
• Following instructions (completing the specific tasks requested, not just randomly browsing)

What you DON’T need:

• UX design knowledge
• Technical or programming skills
• Previous testing experience
• Any specific education or qualifications

10 Best Website Testing Platforms

1. UserTesting

Pay per test: $4–$10 (unmoderated), $30–$120 (live interviews) Payout method: PayPal Payout timing: 7 days after test approval Trustpilot rating: 4.5/5 (based on 2,800+ reviews)

UserTesting is the largest and most established website testing platform, with major corporate clients relying on their participant network for product feedback. The volume of available tests is higher than any competitor, which directly translates to more earning opportunities.

Unmoderated tests take 5–20 minutes and pay $4–$10 each. Live conversations (moderated sessions where you speak with a researcher via video call) pay $30–$120 depending on length and complexity. The platform maintains a “test feed” showing available opportunities matched to your profile.

UserTesting’s 4.5/5 Trustpilot rating across 2,800+ reviews is exceptional for a testing platform. Payment reliability is strong — PayPal deposits arrive 7 days after test approval with very few reported payment issues.

2. Userlytics

Pay per test: $5–$20 (unmoderated), $30–$90 (moderated) Payout method: PayPal, Tremendous (gift cards) Payout timing: Processed every two weeks Global availability: Yes

Userlytics partners with major companies and offers a steady stream of testing opportunities. Tests include website usability testing, mobile app testing, prototype evaluation, and video review. The platform implements ISO 27001 security standards, which provides additional data protection confidence.

The biweekly payout schedule is slightly slower than UserTesting’s 7-day window, but test availability and variety are competitive. Userlytics accepts testers globally, broadening the opportunity beyond US-only platforms.

3. TryMyUI (now Trymata)

Pay per test: $10 per test (standard) Payout method: PayPal Payout timing: Within 3–5 business days Availability: US-focused, some international

Trymata (formerly TryMyUI) offers a flat $10 per test — straightforward and predictable. Tests typically involve screen and voice recording while completing specific tasks on a website or app. The consistent $10 rate makes earnings easy to project: 3 tests/week = $30/week = $120/month.

The qualification process involves completing a practice test that’s reviewed for audio clarity, task completion, and feedback quality. Rejection of the qualification test means you’ll need to improve your think-aloud technique and reapply.

4. PlaybookUX

Pay per test: $5 (card sort/tree test), $10 (unmoderated), $50–$120 (moderated) Payout method: PayPal Payout timing: Within 8 days of completion Availability: Global

PlaybookUX offers a range of test types beyond standard website navigation: card sorting (organising content into logical groups), tree testing (finding specific content within a site structure), and moderated live conversations. This variety creates more earning opportunities than platforms limited to one test format.

Card sorts and tree tests are the quickest earning opportunity — 2–10 minutes for $5. These are excellent for filling gaps between longer tests. Moderated sessions pay $50–$120 for 30–90 minutes, making them the highest per-hour earning opportunity on any testing platform.

5. Userbrain

Pay per test: $5 per test Payout method: PayPal Payout timing: After approval (typically same week) Availability: Global

Userbrain’s $5 per test rate is lower than some competitors, but the qualification process is more forgiving, and test frequency can be higher. The platform provides clear instructions and a guided tour before your first test, reducing the learning curve for new testers.

Each test takes 5–20 minutes of screen and voice recording. The straightforward process and fast approval make Userbrain a solid supplemental platform alongside higher-paying options like UserTesting.

6. Test IO

Pay per test: Variable (paid per approved bug) Payout method: PayPal, bank transfer (IBAN), Skrill Payout timing: After test cycle completion Availability: Global

Test IO is fundamentally different from other platforms on this list. Instead of recording yourself navigating a website, you’re actively testing software for bugs — functional errors, display issues, broken features, performance problems. You get paid when you find and report bugs that the client confirms as valid.

This model rewards thoroughness and technical attention to detail. Experienced testers who find critical bugs earn more than those reporting minor issues. Test IO offers a 3-step QA assessment for new testers. If you have a methodical mindset and enjoy finding what’s broken rather than sharing opinions, Test IO is uniquely suited.

7. UserPeek

Pay per test: Per-test payment via PayPal Payout method: PayPal Payout timing: After test approval Availability: Global (requires English proficiency at C1 level)

UserPeek focuses on usability testing for websites and apps. The platform requires a qualification test before you can access paid opportunities. Tests involve speaking thoughts aloud while completing tasks — the standard UX testing format.

English proficiency at C1 level (advanced) is explicitly required, and the qualification test evaluates this alongside your testing technique. For non-native English speakers with strong proficiency, UserPeek provides access to the same testing opportunities as native speakers.

8. Userlytics

Pay per test: $5–$90 depending on test type and length Payout method: PayPal Payout timing: Every two weeks

(Already covered above — this slot replaced with:)

8. Loop11

Pay per test: Varies Payout method: PayPal Payout timing: After test completion and approval Availability: Global panel (applications open)

Loop11 maintains a panel of paid website testers. The qualification process involves a 5-minute test requiring webcam and microphone access. Once approved, you receive invitations for paid usability tests matching your profile.

Test frequency varies — Loop11 is a smaller platform, so invitations may be less frequent than UserTesting or Userlytics. But as a supplemental platform alongside the major players, it adds additional testing opportunities to your pipeline.

9. TestingTime

Pay per test: Varies by study type (typically $20–$80 per session) Payout method: Bank transfer, vouchers Payout timing: After study completion Availability: Primarily Europe (Switzerland, Germany, France, UK, Netherlands, Austria)

TestingTime focuses on connecting testers with usability studies that include testing apps, websites, physical products, gadgets, and food — broader than pure website testing. Sessions can be in-person, remote moderated, or remote unmoderated. Pay tends to be higher than survey-style platforms, reflecting the more involved participation.

The main limitation is geographic — TestingTime’s core markets are European, with fewer opportunities for US-based testers. European participants benefit from a platform that’s well-established in their markets. The company is upfront that invitations arrive irregularly and testing won’t become a full income source.

10. TesterWork

Pay per test: Variable (paid per bug found) Payout method: PayPal, bank transfer (IBAN), Skrill Payout timing: After test cycle completion Availability: Global (100,000+ testers)

Like Test IO, TesterWork pays for finding bugs in software rather than recording navigation feedback. The platform has a community of over 100,000 testers and offers new test cycles daily. A 3-step QA assessment determines your initial qualification.

The bug-bounty model means earnings are variable — methodical testers who find genuine issues earn more, while those who struggle to identify problems earn less. TesterWork is best suited for technically-minded testers who enjoy detective work.

Earnings Comparison

Platform	Per Test	Test Type	Payout Speed	Best For
UserTesting	$4–$120	UX + live	7 days	Highest volume
Userlytics	$5–$90	UX + live	Biweekly	Global reach
Trymata	$10 flat	UX	3–5 days	Predictable rate
PlaybookUX	$5–$120	UX + card sorts + live	8 days	Test variety
Userbrain	$5	UX	Same week	Easy qualification
Test IO	Per bug	QA/Bug testing	End of cycle	Technical testers
UserPeek	Varies	UX	After approval	Non-native English
Loop11	Varies	UX	After approval	Supplemental
TestingTime	$20–$80	UX + product	After study	European testers
TesterWork	Per bug	QA/Bug testing	End of cycle	Bug hunters

Income Math: What Website Testers Actually Earn

Website testing pays well per test but offers limited volume. Here’s the realistic monthly picture.

Unmoderated tests (most common):

• Test availability: 2–5 per week across multiple platforms
• Average payout: $8–$12 per test
• Weekly income: $16–$60
• Monthly income: $65–$240

Adding moderated sessions:

• Moderated availability: 1–3 per month (highly variable)
• Average payout: $40–$80 per session
• Additional monthly: $40–$240
• Combined monthly income: $100–$480

Monthly income by engagement level:

Approach	Platforms	Tests/Month	Monthly Income
Casual (1 platform)	UserTesting only	4–8	$30–$80
Active (3 platforms)	UT + Userlytics + Trymata	8–15	$80–$200
Dedicated (5+ platforms)	All major platforms	12–25	$150–$400
Maximised (all + moderated)	Everything available	15–30+	$200–$500

Income ceiling: Website testing income tops out around $300–$500/month for dedicated testers on multiple platforms. This is significantly better than survey income ($100–$300/month) but still firmly supplemental.

For comparison, see best focus group sites that pay — focus groups pay more per session ($50–$300) but with even lower frequency.

How to Get Accepted and Get More Tests

Pass the qualification test on your first try. Most platforms offer one chance. Record in a quiet environment, speak clearly, complete all tasks, and provide detailed (not vague) feedback. Practice the “think aloud” technique before your qualification recording — narrate everything you’re thinking as you navigate. “I see the homepage has a large banner… I’m looking for pricing… I’ll try the main menu… I don’t see a pricing tab, which is frustrating because that’s what I came here for.”

Build your profile comprehensively. More demographic data = more test matches. Fill out every available field: age, occupation, industry, devices owned, apps used, shopping habits, tech proficiency. The more data points you provide, the more tests you qualify for.

Maintain high quality ratings. Platforms rate your test quality. Higher-rated testers receive more invitations. Speak clearly, follow instructions precisely, provide thoughtful feedback (not one-word answers), and submit tests promptly. One rejected test can significantly reduce your invitation frequency.

Sign up for multiple platforms. Test volume on any single platform is limited. Registering on 4–5 platforms simultaneously (UserTesting, Userlytics, Trymata, PlaybookUX, Userbrain) dramatically increases your overall test availability. Each platform draws from different client pools.

Respond to invitations immediately. Popular tests fill within minutes. Enable push notifications and check your email frequently. Testing opportunities are first-come, first-served — speed matters.

For the broader perspective on how microtask income compares to other methods, see apps that pay you real money instantly and realistic online income expectations. For a deeper review of the leading platform, see UserTesting review. For an overview of the lead generation model, see local lead generation.

Pros and Cons

Pros: Pays significantly more per hour than surveys ($15–$30/hr vs $2–$5/hr). No technical or UX expertise required — just basic computer literacy and clear speech. Tests are often interesting — evaluating real products from real companies. Flexible timing for unmoderated tests (complete anytime). Global availability on most platforms. No investment or startup cost required. Can be combined with survey income for diversified microtask earnings.

Cons: Test volume is limited — 2–5 per week per platform is typical, capping monthly income at $300–$500. Qualification tests can reject you, with limited reapplication. Audio/video recording requirements need a quiet environment and basic equipment. Moderated sessions require scheduled availability at specific times. Payment delays of 7–14 days on most platforms. Quality ratings affect future test availability — poor tests reduce invitations. Speaking thoughts aloud while performing tasks takes practice and feels unnatural initially.

Frequently Asked Questions

How much do website testers make? $100–$500/month across multiple platforms with consistent effort. Individual tests pay $5–$15 (unmoderated) or $30–$120 (moderated live sessions). The limiting factor is test availability, not hourly rate.

Do I need UX experience? No. Companies want regular users — not UX professionals. Your value is providing the perspective of a normal person encountering their product for the first time. Professional UX knowledge can actually be counterproductive, as companies already have internal UX teams.

How often will I get tests? 2–5 per week per platform on average, depending on your demographic profile and the current demand. Some weeks you’ll receive more, some fewer. Multiple platform registrations smooth out the variability.

Is website testing better than surveys? Per hour — absolutely. Website testing pays $15–$30/hour equivalent versus $2–$5/hour for surveys. Total monthly income may be similar because test volume is lower, but you earn the same money in far less time, freeing you for other activities.

What equipment do I need? A computer or smartphone, stable internet, a microphone (built-in is fine), and a quiet space. Some tests require a webcam. No special software purchases needed — platforms provide their own recording tools.

Can I do this alongside a full-time job? Yes. Unmoderated tests can be completed on your own schedule — evenings, weekends, or during lunch breaks. Moderated sessions require scheduling but are typically offered across multiple time slots including evenings.

The Bottom Line

Website testing is the best-paying microtask income available — $15–$30/hour equivalent for work that requires no specialised skills. If you’re currently earning $2–$5/hour from surveys, testing websites for the same companies that commission those surveys pays 3–10x more per hour.

The trade-off is volume. You’ll complete fewer tests per week than surveys per day, and monthly income caps around $300–$500 for dedicated multi-platform testers. But you’ll earn that in a fraction of the time, and the work is more engaging than answering the same demographic questions for the hundredth time.

For income that isn’t capped by test availability — recurring monthly revenue from digital assets that pay whether you’re testing websites or not — here’s how I build simple websites that generate $500–$1,200/month each.